Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair

Essay topics:

Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.

Nowadays, there are professionals in many fields such as sports, business and other. There is a belief that successful sportsmen could gain more money than people working in other spheres. However, sometimes this could be unfair. This essay will discuss both opinions and personal view will be given in the end.

Some people argue that good sportsmen might gain a lot of money because they don’t live a normal lifestyle. In order to succeed these sportsmen need to develop their sport skills through doing sport exercises and activities. For example, football players would need a lot of practice to win the final match.
Additionally, successful players are worth their earning money because they could bring a lot of benefits in country’s team. Sport professionals could improve country’s position, also would bring success and popularity among other countries.

On the other point of view, sports men work part-time job and must only attend important competitions. They work less and earn more money than people who work in significant professions. Totally, I agree with the point of view that it is justice for sports professionals to earn more money than other professional.

To conclude, some people argued whether it is justice for sports professionals to get more money than professionals who work in other considerable fields. Some of them agree that it is fair because sports players have a difficult life while others think that is unfair because professionals in other fields work harder in many cases. In my point of view, sports players fairly deserve more money than others.

Votes
Average: 4.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-05 Ahmad_off 56 view
2023-05-21 ngthanh1220@gmail.com 78 view
2022-06-30 hungdung2507 84 view
2022-04-10 proshipper 89 view
2021-12-12 Hoàng Tiến Đạt 89 view
Essays by user Azizat Gilmeyeva :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... work part-time job and must only attend important competitions. They work less a...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rn more money than other professional. To conclude, some people argued whether ...
^^^
Line 8, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... To conclude, some people argued whether it is justice for sports professionals t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, for example, such as, in many cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26744186047 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79680909204 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531007751938 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1941092498 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415530899425 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139068060127 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895174853717 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223185085816 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103078049559 0.056905535591 181% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.