Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

The amount of money which a professional athlet would make during his or her career, is begin a matter of debate. Whether they deserve the huge sum of income or not is being discussed in this essay.
On the one hand, it takes a long time of hard practicing for a sports person to reach to the professional level. Beside the innate capabilities, there must be an immence dedication and perseverence that leads to introduction a prof. in world level. Without any doubt it's not everyone's land. For example, a wrestling champion needs hours of practice, education, diet, etc. to reach to olympic tournoment. Moreover, regarding to relative short career span, athletes have not more than ten to fifteen years for making money out of their art. A famous soccer player, for instance, does not have more of a decade to flourish and gain financial benefit from football leagues. Consequently this enormous salary could be justified.
On the other hand, I believe that the discrepancy between sport profies and other jobs has reached to a tremendous level. Firstly, a difference between a prosperous tennis player, like Roger Federer, and even a successful physician is so high that sends a bad signals to students who are into science and Medicine major. This unadequately can be seen even amongst people who practicing the same sport, for example even among footballists. Secondly, there are so many other jobs which needs as much training, skill acquisition and risking as a prominant boxer. We can mention a fighter-jet pilot that needs same effort and even more qualification and education in comparison to a boxer that can not earn even one-tenth total income and it seems to me completely unfair. Finally, I do believe that there should be an equal and moderate payment system which pay its attention to each work's hardship.
Overall, although it seems wise that a sport professional gain huge earning, I believe that income must be equalized and justified among all professions.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'begun'.
Suggestion: begun
...would make during his or her career, is begin a matter of debate. Whether they deserv...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 64, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...es a long time of hard practicing for a sports person to reach to the professional lev...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ence that leads to introduction a prof. in world level. Without any doubt its not ...
^^
Line 2, column 268, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...prof. in world level. Without any doubt its not everyones land. For example, a wres...
^^^
Line 2, column 671, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...inancial benefit from football leagues. Consequently this enormous salary could be justified...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78844526524 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615151515152 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3576100395 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14276634811 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362199424604 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335578212963 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789668956144 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216134263929 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.