Task 2 it is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages

Essay topics:

Task 2: it is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as South pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages.

In recent years, environment has becoming in a matter of discussion. Nowadays, surveys or visitors can travel a large distance to natural environment as south pole. In this essay, I will examine the benefits and drawbacks of visiting long pace to wildlife.

There are several advantages of moving on natural environment. Firstly, people can explore the addition of new plants or animals in forests. For example, there are a various of creatures in wildlife such as insects or beetles in Amazon. For this reason, if scientists find out a animal which is an unusual, it will promote the development of biology. In addition, natural habitats have many plants that are able to cure diseases for people so it brings more positive for treatment. Secondly, tourists learn a lot of knowledge about organisms in forests. For instance, we can study features of animals or plants such as learn about what’re animals eat, where’re they live and which’re they breed eggs or not. Therefore, people have information about them through traveling in natural environment.

There are various disadvantages of going to wildlife. First of all, there are many hazards for people if they travel to natural habitats. This is because natural forest have many endanger animals such as snakes, tigers or bears. When someone was bite by a snake, he had a risk of death due to a high venom of snakes. As a results, it is danger for people visit. Furthermore, it has negative impacts to wild habitats. To illustrate, some surveys killed many animals in both land and ocean to research and it lead to animals extinction. Also, developed tourism makes natural forest water or land pollution such as dispose of litter on the ground or sea.

In conclusion, scientists and tourists visit to wildlife as South pole with long distance. In my opinion, it is beneficial for tourism or education because people can learn a lot of knowledge about new organisms. The advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 6.9 (3 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...For this reason, if scientists find out a animal which is an unusual, it will pro...
^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...death due to a high venom of snakes. As a results, it is danger for people visit. Further...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
... both land and ocean to research and it lead to animals extinction. Also, developed ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05198776758 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8039528386 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538226299694 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7633907012 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.0909090909 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8636363636 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279387244714 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785017296311 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593454592162 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168608203906 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152505561717 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.