Although things used to fixed and utilized for a long period by people in the former, nowadays, people tend to discard these faulty features without thinking. The vast income and the development of technology can be the main causes behind this issue. This trend may worsen some pollution involves land and water pollution and can increase diseases. This essay will discuss the various reasons of this trend and their consequences on the environment.
At least two important factors help to explain why an increasing number of people are now throw damaged things away. Firstly, earning lots of money may enabled people to discard items which are unworkable. The people who find the plenty of money can purchase new appliances instead of damaged items without worry. Secondly, advancement of electronics might put people to throw away trend. The state-of-art technologies are produced every year so that people attempt to purchase modern appliances. For instance, every year, the people replaced their former smartphone by iPhone’s new versions.
It is clear that people’s throw away habit results considerable negative consequences. First, the land and the water pollution will increase because of thrown rubbishes. A number of discarded appliances are often made by non-biodegradable raw materials, thus these wastes can influence soil and rivers harmfully. Another effect of this change is that the growth of diseases, namely cough and lung-fever among people. In other words, as the chemicals of these thrown items interacted with the air, and as a result, person’s probability that get sick will rise considerably. For instance, one recent study suggest that the 60 percent of total population get disease due to the chemicals.
To conclude, the reason why people nowadays are increasingly thrown unworkable items away can be earning vast money and advanced electronics. This trend can consequences for pollution and one’s health adversely.
- Studying English in an English speaking country is the best but not the only way to learn the language agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 78
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 83
- Cultures in different countries are more similar today than they used to be What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s used to fixed and utilized for a long period of time by people in the former, nowadays, peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, at least, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43911439114 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84582478367 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616236162362 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.071341426 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.125 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242697890595 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708547946278 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533220062267 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13376179186 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459339015927 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.