Task 2: Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
In this day and age, choosing what major to study is a hotly debated topic, often dividing mixed opinions, especially among students. While many people claim that most of the main subjects at school should be prioritized, students are incentivized to engage in food science courses that serve their living. From my outlook, I completely believe in the importance of learning the science of food and the way to cook a meal.
On the one side, a huge number of students spend a decent time attending lessons according to the school curriculum. The first advantage is that schoolers can have a fundamental knowledge of core subjects and then they apply it in their living and employment. For example, being good at English, teenagers own an ideal opportunity to apply for scholarships and studying abroad. Besides that, students gain a lot of needy skills such as flexibility from mathematics and memorizing from literature. However, it would be a disadvantageous situation for students because they do not optimize their major and strength that play an essential role in recruitment. Learning some subjects like physic, chemistry, and math is time-consuming in place of studying their grade which directs them to their profession.
On the other side, it is extremely necessary for students to register for culinary courses at educational institutions. Firstly, students can follow a healthy lifestyle since they research the ingredients and quality of any kind of food. For instance, if they are aware of the detrimental effects of fast food including blood pressure and obesity, they will limit eating as much as possible. Secondly, in the case of living independently or staying away from home, they can prepare meals that provide enough nutrition to exist and self-cater without support from others. Finally, cooking skills can be an outstanding point to make their curriculum vitae flawless and well-presented when applying works related to food such as being a chef and working in the food business.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that learning key subjects will be useful in their plans. Indeed, currently, food has contributed immensely to the economy and meets people's demands. Consequently, studying the science of food and the food production process will be more beneficial than obtaining knowledge in every field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 774, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... chef and working in the food business. In conclusion, it is undeniable that lea...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...han obtaining knowledge in every field.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26344086022 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93853970685 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599462365591 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3699703049 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.176470588 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0588235294 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23318445877 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718795056638 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524522537246 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150522291045 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496060010746 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.