Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, working in a team can teach more life skills than doing alone. Some people who work together as individuals can be better. From my perspective, this problem has two sides and I will discuss my view below.
On the one hand, teamwork can support people to increase communication. Working in a team requires effective communication with fellow players. For instance, in soccer, players have to contact teammates and coaches to understand the system and interact with other footballers in a match. Additionally, group work may increase motivation in a team. Working with others can provide a sense of motivation and camaraderie. When observing mates in a group do their work, members will have motivation and can achieve goals together.
On the other hand, although it has a large number of benefits when working with a team, we cannot deny the importance of working alone. Individual work can increase focus and concentration. Working alone allows people to do their work without distractions or interruptions from others. For example, in some sports such as chess, it is necessary for players to focus on these games and defeat the competitor. Beside that, individuals may have control over their work. When citizens work alone, they can control their work and make decisions without arguing with others. Because, in a group, there are many members and many ideas, so it is difficult to operate and summarize all the ideas.
To conclude, not only team activities but also working alone teach people skills which can apply to their life. However, I prefer working with a team to doing it alone.
- Now many people spend less and less time at home What are the causes for this What are the effects of this on individuals and on the society 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task Write a letter to a friend expressing your interest to seek employment in a different country Your letter should include why you want to work in a different country what type of work you will be looking for q
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 67
- The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they give birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 67
- The charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tivation and can achieve goals together. On the other hand, although it has a lar...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... On the other hand, although it has a large number of benefits when working with a team, we c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74534177548 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56015037594 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5455092255 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.3529411765 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6470588235 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1800233906 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072874394829 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988011495328 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159862454798 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984112964384 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.