Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s society, some people believe that teamwork can help them develop soft skills for their lives. In this essay, I agree with this statement and discuss my views below.
Firstly, working in a team can help people improve their communication skills. Team activities provide opportunities for individuals to develop their skills in a good environment. They can learn how to express their ideas clearly, actively listen to others, and resolve their conflicts. In some specific circumstances, for example, there will be an argument or debate between group members, so individuals can have a chance to participate in and tackle some problems. It can help not only personally improve their soft skills, but also help the team build strong relationships and go up.
In addition, it includes leadership and followership in each group. The leader plays an important role and guides members to complete the mission, allowing individuals to develop leadership skills such as decision making and problem solving. According to a recent survey, most citizens said that they could not finish a task on time without a group captain. Moreover, team activities also teach the importance of being a good follower, following the instructors, and supporting the team’s goals. This group can easily achieve success only if both the captain and the members are towards the same goal.
In summary, teamwork can positively influence individuals. The people will be more beneficial about developing connection skills and also becoming a good captain or member
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000
- The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of adults who were overweight or obese between 1965 to 2015 while the pie chart demonstrates the part of adults who were overweight obese severely obese and healthy or underweight in 2015 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, for example, in addition, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38524590164 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84220646636 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618852459016 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.993585418 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8571428571 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194425474303 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665876213127 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529261741588 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108901583924 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302543672135 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.