Technology has brought so many changes that modern lifestyles are completely different from the way people lived in the past. Do you think the positive effects of technology outweigh its disadvantages.
The role of technological achievements is believed to trigger numerous cutting-edge transformations in every dimension of lives, which draws a distinction between the actual world and the preceding time. Much as there are undoubtedly two sides of this issue, in my perspective, there is a growing support for the advantages brought back, and this essay aims to highlight it.
A very common gain of these circumstances is advanced techniques are the key terms to have everything completed efficiently as on a daily basis, the scientific breakthroughs appear rapidly and become a phenomenon due to its flexibility and tangible values. This scenario could also be favorable in terms of diversifying the way in which individual pursuit their leisure activities since it is worth determining the optimum choice among these top-notch techniques to handle the works adequately. This could be exemplified by state of art robotic systems which are proud to be the latest advances in artificial intelligence, becoming more prevalent in developing countries by supporting household chores and automatic production line.
However, we should not turn a blind eye to the expected undesirable outcomes, one of which is the complications these inventions bring back to obsolete and technology-illiterate residents on the ground of generation gap and technological knowledge acquisitions. Another threat worth preparing for is the negative impact on social interaction as not until did human approach modernisation that they had a tendency to prefer online to face-to-face communication by sending messages and video calls. To prove my point, according to a recent survey, people now would rather use mobile applications such as Facebook, Messenger, and Instagram for interacting purposes, especially in Covid-19 pandemic on the grounds of quarantine. Admittedly, it could also be said that these drawbacks are not capable of causing severe deleterious impact on human lives. Besides, these unwanted issues could be prevented effortlessly by teaching methodologies and education revolution.
I would like to conclude by saying then that society needs to be aware of both positive and negative consequences but not to be anxious about the demerits because the advantages of this issue are believed to be dominant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-23 | mminhhchau | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows the different stages in the manufacturing and use of steel 100
- The percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in 4 countries in 1970 and 2000 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 91
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shop and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Percentage of pupils who passed their final exams 1993 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5641025641 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3330654676 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638176638177 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.150075307 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.545454545 106.682146367 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9090909091 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0723774881366 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0251429546514 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255064840913 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0415687231699 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186545328985 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.0946893788 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.09 50.2224549098 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.56 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.