TECHNOLOGY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR UNEMPLOYMENT. TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE?
Some people believe that modern devices and equipment trigger joblessness. While this may be true to a certain extent, I believe that technological advancements are not to blame for unemployment.
On the one hand, technology may deprive people of their jobs. Machines may possess some advantages over humans in terms of efficiency and accuracy. While people may only work for a specific period of time and they can be distracted by environmental factors, technological devices and equipment can work productively as well as remain concentrated even if they have to operate continuously. In addition, self-learning capabilities have been engineered into technological innovations, which enable them to be more efficient at their tasks. As a result, machines could all the more marginalize human's place in the workforce.
On the other hand, it would be unfair if technology is the sole culprit of unemployment among populations. First, technological progress could help reduce joblessness as it may create new jobs. For instance, a few decades ago, programmers seemed to be non-existent. However, these days, in the light of the blooming of technology, more and more IT workers are required, thus may leading to a decrease in unemployment. Second, insufficient vacancies in firms and factories may also deprive people of their work. The growth in the number of applicants to a job may result in an increased level of competition for that position. As some people may not be able to compete or do not meet companies' requirements, they would be made redundant. Therefore, it is clear that technological advancements do not attribute to joblessness.
In conclusion, it may be true that modern machinery is responsible for unemployment, I am convinced that joblessness is not solely attributable to technological progress.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 73
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Friendships can be very meaningful and special but also very complicated What are the qualities of a great friend What are some things that can weaken a close relationship over 56
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ile people may only work for a specific period of time and they can be distracted by environme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38461538462 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39807616305 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555944055944 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.619047222 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.25 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15539885223 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551664755756 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509359043695 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109927944302 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026721335383 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.