Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement??
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Write at least 250 words.
In many people's standpoints, spending on arts like music and theater is a misuse of the budget. Although I approve the government to utilize the money to construct and upgrade the public infrastructure, I do not think the investment in arts is a wastage.
Our society is composed of various factors, some of which may seem not so vital to human lives. The government should spend a large sum of the budget on public services, for they are the factors that directly impact the quality of life of the population. Take hospitals, for instance. A hospital with advanced types of equipment will have more capability to detect diseases precisely and timely, leading to the fact that the patients will be treated effectively in a short time. Therefore, the government authorities must invest more finances in strengthening the infrastructure to ensure citizen's lives.
On the other hand, arts are worth spending a part of the government budget. Thanks to literary arts, modern people can gain a deep insight into how their ancestors' lives were in the past or how their friends globally spend their days. People can easily realize that music is ubiquitous in daily life. A possible explanation for its popularity is its ability to comfort listeners with rhythm and lyrics. In other words, music has a significant effect on people's emotions and feelings. Due to their benefits, some of which are abovementioned, arts deserve investment from the government to enhance its availability to people worldwide.
In conclusion, I strongly advocate the government's spending on advancing public services. In addition, I think the budget spent on arts is not wasteful but worthy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | hanhkatori2402 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-30 | thuhuyen29042006 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | Huonglando1710 | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 73
- To meet the growing needs of food for the increasing population country should make use of edible insects as foods However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but also affect negatively the nature too What are the benefits and drawback 84
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 73
- Some say that rich countries should help poor countries with trade health and education Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, therefore, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11764705882 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93903414625 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580882352941 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6621371697 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200728127623 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675275419223 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579271029027 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131619728214 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444549358073 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.