There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays?
In today's fast-paced world, people often find themselves consumed by various priorities, leaving little time for leisurely activities such as music. Nonetheless, music remains a universally affordable and accessible form of entertainment for the general populace, with numerous bands and dance groups attaining international fame. This rise in popularity has led to debates regarding the relevance of traditional music compared to its modern adversaries and whether music as a whole can maintain its foothold. In this essay, I shall provide insights into these questions, complemented by rationales.
It is irrefutable that music holds a vital role in our cultural lives. Melodies have the power to evoke emotions in individuals, reminding them of their national and personal identities. Furthermore, it helps people to express themselves through rhythms and tunes, chasing away the blandness of everyday life. In addition to that, apart from such artistic importance, music also has a practical role for countless individuals around the globe. Numerous people often utilize background tunes during work because of the visible benefits they bring to the table, for instance, improving their focus and productivity. Moreover, music serves as a relaxing incentive, unwinding stresses and pressures on our minds.
As for the second question, the role of traditional music in modern days is of undoubtedly paramount significance. While the popularity of foreign songs is undeniably rising, overall, despite the catchy tunes and lyrics and the accompaniment of dances and effects they have, to the native population, the cultural value and meaning they have attached to themselves are often little in comparison with the centuries-old history of traditional music, which is an integral component in innumerable cultures, serving as a display and preservation of their unique beauties. Additionally, they are also a gateway connecting the present to the past so that later generations can keep to their origins. As such, they have the potential to foster social cohesion and promote cultural understanding, making them a crucial element in shaping our societies.
In conclusion, the harmony of notes and chords provides our lives with an impactful and enjoyable feeling and to rid ourselves of our burdens, and folk music is an indisputable contributor to this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-24 | Roy An | 95 | view |
| 2023-11-24 | Roy An | 95 | view |
| 2023-11-17 | Tosyne | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Hypnogogic | 61 | view |
- The UN recently celebrated its 70th anniversary What benefits has it brought during this time Do you think the UN will last another 70 years 87
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 11
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 11
- This is an IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer essay from the real exam on the topic of kiwi fruit exports from New Zealand to various other countries 85
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, second, so, while, apart from, as for, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57660167131 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08229322065 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610027855153 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.8284643549 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.466666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221130265133 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759083025998 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682781826555 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133767184923 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614690596826 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.