In some countries, shopping online is replacing shopping at stores. Discuss both the pros and cons of this trend.
Due to the advancements in the field of technology, in various nations nowadays, shopping online has been gaining momentum among consumers because of the edge this method has over its traditional counterparts. Even though there are negatives to this development, this trend will continue nevertheless on account of the advantages found in the following paragraphs.
On one end of the spectrum, it is irrefutable that there exists a myriad of inconveniences and flaws in the e-shopping system. For instance, one disadvantage of this form of trading is its limitations on customers, notably the inability to interact physically with products. This hinders sufficient evaluation of the goods as they are limited to visual images, risking the buyers' experience with scams or qualities failing short of expectations. In addition, the increasing popularity of this platform means it is a dynamic breeding ground for cybercrimes like identity thefts, resulting in the deterioration of clients' trust because of the constant jeopardy of their information and money. Furthermore, the surge in dominance of this commercial activity consequently entices companies to invest in advertisements on the Internet, affecting users outside of commerce and leading to visual pollution on websites.
On the flip side, online shopping provides an incontrovertibly substantial number of values to customers and retailers alike. First and foremost, the frontrunner of merits e-commercing brings to the market is its incredible convenience. Instead of going to shops to make a purchase, people can have the comfort of their houses while browsing the aisles. Additionally, online shopping is also the enabler of international commerce, as it allows the acquisition of items from every corner of the globe, respective to locations, but still reasonable, shipping costs and delays, which are declining through logistical developments. Moreover, online shops require less capital for entrepreneurs, as primary expenditures like premises, employees or utilities are all of which the digital realm is oblivious to, promoting competition as the number of businesses spike and thus economic upturns. To illustrate, an increase in the number of competitors will dissuade fraudulent activities for short-term benefits in place of winning consumers' trust.
In conclusion, while the drawbacks of digital markets are numerous, the upsides inevitably overshadow them on account of both the satisfaction of shoppers and retailers.
- In recent years advocating for the decrease of pollution imprints was critical among which is for cycling as a commuting method because of its unpopularity despite the positive impacts on the environment it brings to the table In the following paragraphs
- Children s education is expensive In some countries the government pays some of or all of the costs What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 93
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 95
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 11
- Although more and more people read the news on the Internet newspapers will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people Do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 577, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd for cybercrimes like identity thefts, resulting in the deterioration of client...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2122.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70430107527 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27987835673 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620967741935 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8598937508 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.571428571 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196249067528 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058696706372 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403411555796 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103761909209 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500625484475 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 577, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd for cybercrimes like identity thefts, resulting in the deterioration of client...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2122.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70430107527 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27987835673 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620967741935 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8598937508 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.571428571 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196249067528 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058696706372 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403411555796 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103761909209 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500625484475 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.