Recently, there is a growing trend in spending money to go to stadiums or arenas and watch an amusing event. Some people argue that spectators waste their time and income for viewing such programs. However, many scholars align with spending money for seeing a public event. So do I because the interest to attend in person in public social occasions will develop the local economy and people get energy to commerce their tasks.
Spending money to present in an exciting public affair has some merits. It helps the economy of a community to boost by creating more job opportunities for the local as a surge of people pay money to watch a nail-biting match or ceremony. The money could be applied by the state for paying the salary of employees who have arranged the attendance of the occurrence. Furthermore, people can relieve if they fill their leisure time by such programs. Unfortunately, a majority of labors or students face frequent stressful situations daily which make them angry or exhausted. Experiencing exhilarating moments, on the contrary, help them to not only forget about their humdrum life but also gain energy to do their careers properly.
On the other hand, spending a bulk of money for the ticket of sport activities or rituals has some drawbacks. Firstly, people fritter their time since they do not spend their time productively. Such occasions which are repeated regularly are not informative in case of not participating, thereby losing a considerable proportion of their budget for a useless activity. Secondly, as cultural events or matches arouse excitement in people, many of them, especially the youth, might become addicted to seeing them. Consequently, they would not concentrate on their main duty which is work or study.
In conclusion, although some demerits of buying tickets for watching sports or traditional occasions might provoke some uncertainty about its burgeoning, I optimistically believe that their benefits overweigh. To recapitulate, not only can they develop an economy by establishing more jobs, but also they will be an outlet for unpleasant feelings.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20588235294 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.892533043 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579411764706 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.121140932 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.117647059 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181768261965 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063622219935 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528712732828 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12051864476 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293784771643 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.