‘throwaway” society
In this modern age, people tend to dispose of their used items and purchase new ones regardless of their good condition. Various reasons have contributed to this phenomenon, and its impacts on people and the environment should be taken into consideration.
The main culprit of this phenomenon is the mass production of consumer goods thanks to the industrial revolution. People are able to buy products at more affordable prices. As a result, people are less likely to value such items and may easily decide to replace them with new ones before they become unusable. Besides, the constant improvement of products, coupled with the extensive advertisement on various forms of media, are also responsible for this phenomenon. The latest versions are continuously released and advertised as being superior to the old ones. Consequently, customers are tempted or even manipulated into buying them by these deliberately misleading advertisements into buying them.
People living in the this throwaway society could suffer terribly financial trouble. They would find it hard to save money for a rainy day unexpected situations or even be burned with enormous debt if they keep chasing the newest items. People would then suffer some severe mental health conditions such as stress, anxiety or even depression as a result of the heavy consumption. In some worst cases, some might even resort to illegal acts to earn money. Moreover, The throwaway culture also puts intense pressure on the environment. The disposal of items after a short time of use increases the amount of trash dumped into the environment, of among which only a small proportion is treated properly and the rest is either buried or burned. Soil, water and air pollution can all be a result of inappropriate waste disposal. This could also greatly affect the health of the population living nearby the polluted area.
In conclusion, various factors lead to the birth of the throwaway culture, which might have dramatic effects on people and the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-12 | Aung | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-12 | trikhung777 | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | dhaliwalhargun | 11 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | TranMinhDuc | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-23 | samarjot | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...nts into buying them. People living in the this throwaway society could suffer terribly...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, then, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21846153846 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82733905888 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8560277568 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7647058824 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0943386006027 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351748236518 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862875760665 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586123274023 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587182412787 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.