Today almost all levels of education prioritizes theoretical aspects of learning more than practical ones. To what extent do you agree of disagree with this opinion?
It is argued that in almost all levels of education, huge emphasis is laid on teaching theories that are demanded by the curriculum and that an opportunity for students to acquire on-sight practical experience is rare. I completely agree with the above statement. Apart from learning theoretical concepts, teachers are delighted to dictate notes so that students could memorize the same and stop bothering the teacher by asking unnecessary questions. Examinations are regarded as yardstick to measure how well students have understood whatever they were taught by teachers in the classroom.
From my point of view, at all levels of education, rote-learning dominates and that there is no motivation in teaching students beyond textbooks. Much of what is taught at school or at university is nonsense on stilts and politically tendentious and offers a little worth in the marketplace or for the enrichment of mind and soul. On top of that, students are drowned in information but still starving for knowledge and wisdom. Similarly, teachers want to free themselves from the bother of having to explain to kids unnecessary questions which can really be of monumental curiosity to them. This is what they do in order to find a means of escape and will stop short of nothing to evade their queries.
Even though institutions commit that students will be positioned in some organizations to enable them deeper their understanding of their learning at schools or universities, they rarely get a chance to experience as these institutions commitment is mostly confined to lip service. Hands-on education and internships are few and far between. So, the students assimilate only theoretical concepts but fail to understand the practical implications of these concepts that are put too high on an academic pedestal.
To sum up, it is true that all levels of education places high importance on imparting theoretical concepts to students rather than helping them learn the application of these theoretical frameworks in real life. This will not make them necessarily competitive as the labor market has now become competitive and employers are excruciatingly focusing on labor arbitrage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-13 | abishek_dhakal | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 200 and 2010 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 100
- The chart below shows the total numbers of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'institutions'' or 'institution's'?
Suggestion: institutions'; institution's
...ely get a chance to experience as these institutions commitment is mostly confined to lip se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, similarly, so, still, well, apart from, it is true, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32080924855 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08580256768 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586705202312 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2507809196 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169381071904 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555179840685 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496359317858 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996812562741 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329043718546 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.