Today, the expensive price of popular consumer products is because of the power of advertising and not real needs of people. Do you agree or disagree?
In the 5.0 society era, the great influence of advertising and tertiary needs turns the price tags of high-rank products consumed to be expensive. I, partially, consent to same view of this for several reasons which will be elucidated more below.
Regarding the basis of human needs, smart societies prefer great testimony and rating of items shifting their references. Apparently, high-class societies tendentiously purchase new collection of luxury items at all time. In connection with the increasing demand of products, the companies might subtantially increase the value of products . Furthermore, more and more celebrities introduce the items to social media leading their fans to buy them. Some fanatic individuals mostly convince public to keep updating with what they have posessed. Consequently, they might be compulsive shoppers and messed their finances trapped in debt.
On the flip side, the higher price is mostly likely inflicted by how massive the advertisments are. Producers of goods spend big amount of budget to promote such as billboard and online ads. Should common citizens pay high attention to such ads, company strategy will foster company performance. Additionally, social environments reach public recognition by the ability of purchasing those stuff. To perform exclusive outlook, certain positions (manager and director) tend to dress luxury fashion products. The more important occupation of individuals is, the more valuable the price of items they will wear.
To conclude, it appears to me that great expense of advertising and social recognition becomes the more significant effects of popular products to be on top price. This is as long as public figure continually posts what they wear and consume to all media.
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 84
- Despite better access to education many adults today still cannot read or write In what ways are they disadvantaged What can governments do to help them 80
- Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drinks that have been scientifically proven to be bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Recent research has shown that business meetings and training are increasingly taking place online What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 89
- It is believed that a heavier sentence on citizens who embroil road traffic offences can vividly optimise the safety of road users Partially I consent to the same perspective for reasonable points which I will elaborate in the forthcoming paragraph 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tantially increase the value of products . Furthermore, more and more celebrities ...
^^
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'positions'' or 'position's'?
Suggestion: positions'; position's
.... To perform exclusive outlook, certain positions manager and director tend to dress luxu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, consequently, furthermore, if, look, regarding, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5037037037 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87805373675 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648148148148 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.7941555453 49.4020404114 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.875 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113674234888 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349623219025 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606333593526 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870978001855 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611725257517 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.