Today, the expensive price of popular consumer products is because of the power of advertising and not real needs of people. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, advertising power and an increase of supplementary consumer priorly contribute to huge cost of trending items. Personally, I share the same perspective with this view for several reasons which I will elaborate on these paragraphs.
To begin with, trending products are more and more expensive due to two noticeable factors, one of them is the latest technology performance. Apparently, tech lovers often buy the latest gadget since this supports them to foster the professional career. Concerning hi-tech quality, Apple brand featured by high security system and elegant design, the supplier places its value high price. Furthermore, the rarest materials also strengthen the product value as a matter-of-fact detail process-making from its fabricators. Rolex, for instance, uses scarce mineral (white gold) or jewellery substances in order that the hand crafting watches are valuable and worth for high-end price.
On the other hand, advertising takes number one rank of price determination that embodies one of marketing strategies. Seeing a celebrity promotes a product to attract customers, especially youth following what is being endorsed without a second thought. For example, K-pop and Otaku place a higher value on their idol products, in many cases, this adversely causes addiction, sadly celebrity worship syndrome. Additionally, companies hang up their prices highly because modern society seek out public recognition. Some people tend to dress luxury in order to perform with an exclusive outlook, despite their low social background. to bring a spotlight, they crave on lending money and committing crime, even worse saddled with crippling debts.
To conclude, I would contend that advertising and tertiary need become consumer’s big influence on the exorbitant product price, including celebrity promotion and public eye. This is as long as consumerism behaviour remains considering its quality.
- Governments should introduce healthcare which prevents illness rather than cures it How far do you agree with this statement 70
- In some parts of the world traditional festivals and celebrations have disappeared or are disappearing What problems is this causing What measures could be taken to counter this situation 84
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 80
- Nowadays both men and women spend much money on beauty care This was not so in the past What may be the root cause of this behaviour Discuss the reasons and possible results 84
- It is believed that a heavier sentence on citizens who embroil road traffic offences can vividly optimise the safety of road users Partially I consent to the same perspective for reasonable points which I will elaborate in the forthcoming paragraph 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...overs often buy the latest gadget since this supports them to foster the professiona...
^^^^
Line 5, column 633, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...k, despite their low social background. to bring a spotlight, they crave on lendin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, look, second, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in many cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7212543554 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95760327137 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.724738675958 0.561755894193 129% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1638848974 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.466666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153029987835 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436423937976 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481694381921 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091647625696 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295820215456 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.