Today family members do not eat meals together. Is this a positive or negative trend?
Nowadays all members in family do not eat repast together. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of family members do not meal together. First, all members have time working difficult and difficult jobs, so people choose eat meal in company or school. This dine outside support, presumably tends not only to increase the overall work performance of busy-people but also avoid wasting time on their work in the workplace. Second, eat meal outside would probably result in a greater supply of highly fast workers because they don’t to go to their homes to dine with family, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged is a way to save time and have more skilled and agile workers than those who eat with their families is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits once people don’t eat meal with their families. First, family meal can promote healthy eating habits and better nutrition. Sharing together in family meal can have better academic results. These families eat meal together more connected. Parents become more aware of their children’s lives and young children can get support for any issues they face. Second, eat repeats with family parents have to arrange their works, put it in everyone’s diary in family. Parents even can arrange obligations to have more time for family. This can children’s see how much do parents value family time its important that all members share. Let’s make family dinner a sacred and meaningful family time. It, instead m, would be this is the connection time and everything else can wait.
I was discussed about advantages and disadvantages of do not eat meal with family. From my perspective, this development has more negative than positives on both the individual and the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | soodinzsh | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | soodinzsh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | tteruchan65 | 56 | view |
- The bar charts show information about passable house expenses in England London and to hand over the equivalence in respect to the passable house cost between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in household in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- The graph below shows the average house prices in three countries between the year 1997 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Today family members do not eat meals together Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- The bar chart illustrate the food bought in supermarkets and good bought in supermarkets in three countries including European France Germany and England 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to eat'
Suggestion: to eat
...lt and difficult jobs, so people choose eat meal in company or school. This dine ou...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12576687117 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63369059868 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561349693252 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6584452405 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9473684211 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1578947368 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.89473684211 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342291537286 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122791317996 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867839860818 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223065365413 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242998696107 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.