Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and less time on outdoor sports. Why, is it a positive or negative development.
Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and less time on outdoor sports.
With technological development, people find it easier and easier to use electronic devices. It leads that many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and less time on outdoor sports. In my opinion, while playing computer games may bring children several benefits, I would argue it is eclipsed the drawbacks.
As far as I know, playing computer games can help children a lot. First of all, playing computer games increases coordination because it necessitates coordination abilities for audial, visual, and bodily movement, all of which necessitate a significant amount of mental effort. On-screen events and activities provided by computer games will stimulate the mind. Furthermore, by playing computer games, children can improve their attention and concentration. Computer games keep players' interest for lengthy periods of time by enticing them with rewards such as completing certain objectives or completing a plot.
On the other hand, there are a number of disadvantages of playing computer games that people should take into consideration. The principal one is that spending a long time playing at a computer can have detrimental effects on children's health. For example, you're sitting in one position, pressing the same buttons repeatedly, which can lead to hand and eye strain. A protracted game session can exhaust you physically, reducing your performance at school or at work; as a result, you may achieve lower personal goals. In addition, playing computer games too much can cause aggressive behavior. Some critics of computer gaming have claimed that the violent content of some games, such as the "Grand Theft Auto" series, has influenced players' real-life aggressive behavior and views. According to critics, children may get desensitized to violence as a result of what they see on computer screens.
In conclusion, while playing computer games may have some positive aspects, I believe it is outweighed by the more significant negative aspects. From my point of view, children should spend more time playing outside games instead of playing computer games all day long.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-21 | Gunju1997 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | Phương_TS13 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-06 | phadode | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-06 | phadode | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-22 | Gurpreet__ | 56 | view |
- Some parents think computer games are better for children and they should be allowed to play more of them whereas some parents argue that they are harmful to children 73
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and less time on outdoor sports Why is it a positive or negative development 73
- People are surrounded by advertising and there is an increasing effect on our lives Do you think positive effects outweigh the negative effects 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you're
...fects on childrens health. For example, youre sitting in one position, pressing the s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39884393064 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8766330217 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552023121387 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.875853085 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.777777778 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45915935797 0.244688304435 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176348378003 0.084324248473 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.193009040382 0.0667982634062 289% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.365395354236 0.151304729494 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190372430424 0.056905535591 335% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.