Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays the number of people using mobile phones and computers is increasing. While I accept that this may lead to the loss of the ability to communicate face to face, I believe that there are still a great number of advantages.
On the one hand, more and more people are using mobile phones and computers thanks to their significant benefits. Firstly, these electronic devices enable users to communicate over long distance. For example, in the worlds of business and education, video conferencing allows people to exchange ideas and give feedback without travelling across the world. Also, they are more quickly than sending handwritten letters. In case of emergency, a person can contact easily to his friends or relatives by making a phone call or sending messages.
On the other hand, phones and computers can cause the downfall of face-to-face communication. One reason is that people may become over- reliant on these devices. For instance, people always chat with others by using user- friendly appliances such as Facebook, Skype,.. Consequently, they will lose interaction skills and the ability to manage conflicts, which would lead to a breakdown in communication. Furthermore, everyday people spend a large amount of their time using phones and computers. They frequently spare their free time keeping their eyes glued to the screens and rarely talk with other family members. As the result, they can not expect to build strong relationship and live in harmony with one another.
In conclusion, although technology devices bring lots of benefits, it is certainly true that they can have a negative impact on people’s capacity to communicate face to face.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-23 | Hai Anh | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Uppal singh | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | binhan_04 | 92 | view |
| 2021-04-21 | DIPAN PATIDAR | 56 | view |
| 2018-02-15 | Anna Trieu | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that government money should be spent on important things rather than arts such as painting and music. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- It is not necessary to travel to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people. We can learn just as much from books, films and the internet . Do you agree or disagree. 89
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city 80
- Everyone should stay at school until 18 To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays the number of people using mobi...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re still a great number of advantages. On the one hand, more and more people ar...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing a phone call or sending messages. On the other hand, phones and computers ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...endly appliances such as Facebook, Skype,.. Consequently, they will lose interacti...
^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ndly appliances such as Facebook, Skype,.. Consequently, they will lose interactio...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and live in harmony with one another. In conclusion, although technology devic...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26865671642 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82688103827 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60447761194 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0084164351 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329985977417 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104813995161 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841015927515 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202386894896 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363239639485 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.