Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is stated that nowadays people are losing the ability to communicate in direct methods as they are using mobile phones and computers. While I agree that this would weaken the directly facing communication ability of people, I believe that its effect depends on the way people use it.
On the one hand, using cell phones and computers deteriorates one-to-one communication skills of people for some reasons. One reason is that it lowers the time users spend on direct conversation. It is proved that these leading-edge technologies make people, especially the young, addicted and give them a fear of becoming obsolete if they do not check their phones frequently. Furthermore, phone users may suffer from various mental health problems that affect communication skills like autism. The source of this problem happens when one only focuses on their online profile and forgets about their real-life social circle.
On the other hand, mobile phones and computers can help people gain some valuable skills on face to face interaction. Due to the development of video chat and face time, users can easily have direct conversations with others like in real life. In deep, it strongly benefits people who learn a foreign language. For instance, the development of some online speaking English apps like Cambly provides learners an opportunity to talk to native teachers directly and enhance their speaking skills (which was impossible in the past when there was lack of these technologies). Furthermore, by using technological devices, people can get access to some programs or game shows that teach them the way to successful communication and they can earn valuable skills from it.
In conclusion, it is certainly true that spending time on electronic devices can deteriorate direct communication skills of users, but this is by no means it only affects badly to these skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-23 | Hai Anh | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Uppal singh | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | binhan_04 | 92 | view |
| 2021-04-21 | DIPAN PATIDAR | 56 | view |
| 2018-02-15 | Anna Trieu | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of population playing ten top sports in Canada in 1998 and 2005
- Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers Thus people are losing the ability to communicate face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table shows the average salaries in US dollars in five countries at different stages until achieving the maximum salary
- Task 1 The table shows the average salaries in US dollars in five countries at different stages until achieving the maximum salary
- Task 1 The table shows the average salaries in US dollars in five countries at different stages until achieving the maximum salary Countries Starting After 15 years Maximum Years to reach maximum salary Australia 28000 48000 48000 9 Denmark 45000 54000 54
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20860927152 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8121317842 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576158940397 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0847801942 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237465242725 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951999171393 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965802503427 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152107278094 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109464193707 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.