Topic 30/6/19: Air travel is causing some problems for the environment; therefore, we should increase the price to discourage people. Others disagree that this is the solution. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
It is undeniable that traveling by air generates a huge amount of emission which damages the environment severely. Therefore, some people suggest that an increase in the price of flight tickets will hinder people from flying while others believe there are more to this. This essay will discuss both opinions and express my own.
Travelling by airplanes is increasingly common thanks to the unique experience and the convenience of travelling far distances. Nevertheless, not all can afford this means of transportation in the first place so increasing the costs will probably be effective. It could direct passengers to more reasonable travelling alternatives, such as cars, buses and coaches. Especially with domestic trips, or international ones with water bodies in between countries, people can make a saving while protecting the environment. For example, from Vietnam, it is not necessary to fly and people can reach Laos just by bus.
However, there are still other note-worthy solutions to take when air travel is absolutely needed. Airlines are not the only agencies that offer flights but wealthy businessmen and celebrities can use private aircrafts and choppers to travel more quickly, which pollutes the atmosphere to a great extent. Thus, these journeys should be banned or limited and commercial flights with business class can be offered for more comfort instead of economy class. Additionally, the governments, in active cooperation with travel companies, could manufacture airplanes utilizing more ecofriendly energy sources. As a result, the detrimental impacts made by air travel on the environment might be greatly reduced. For example, solar energy is a stable source that can be harnessed to power airplanes.
To sum up, raising the price of air travel is likely to discourage people from this option; yet, this is not always convenient and feasible, so other measures should also be taken to decrease the emission from planes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-05 | Thu Phuong Dang | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-18 | annguyen0117 | 67 | view |
- Topic 04 05 19 Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports What are the reasons for this and is it a positive or negative development 84
- Topic 25 04 19 In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than large family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 84
- Topic 06 04 19 People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
- Topic 07 06 19 More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Topic 22 6 19 Government should invest in teaching science subjects rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd people can reach Laos just by bus. However, there are still other note-wort...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, as a result, to sum up, in the first place, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40849673203 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91420641005 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0161873568 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250834554065 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822479650374 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592943182109 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166259492021 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692578396194 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.