Topic: Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge. To what extent is this a positive or a negative development?
These days, with the development of information and technology, copyright issues have become a hotly debated topic, as copyrighted music and books can now be downloaded freely with a click. While some believe that this development brings about advantages in a few aspects, it may lead to drastic consequences which are far greater than any advantages.
There is a common belief that downloading copyrighted content at no cost is greatly beneficial to the community. The primary reason is that with this improvement, the number of people who can access valuable sources of knowledge will increase. As a result, the poor might have equal capability to other classes to develop academically. In addition, to the music field, when this form of content is free of charge, residents have a chance to enrich their music soul in particular and art in general. When music can be reached variously, people understand better this field and thus nurture musical talent.
However, there are compelling grounds that freely accessing intellectual content contains more drawbacks compared to its benefits. In the era of the purchasing ratio is strong evidence for product quality and recognition as well, authors find it difficult to ascertain whether their creations are well-qualified or not since everyone has the same ability to take. This will lead to those authors having no motivation to create good songs or books. Intellectual content is not only about recognition but also about showing human ethics. Using someone’s work without allowance is a form of disrespecting their rights and stealing their work. Consequently, the artists are less likely to contribute positively to the community.
All in all, although there are a few reasons why letting citizens utilize copyrighted music and books is positively true, I am of the opinion that there is stronger evidence that it leads to more serious shortcomings than any advantages. It is recommended that copyrighted content should be respected by not allowing people to take it freely and also should not set a high price for that content, which would benefit those with limited financial means.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-22 | Delime | 70 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | minhnhat230602 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-12 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
| 2022-03-10 | Vũ Long Nhật | 82 | view |
| 2022-02-05 | Awadhesh Mourya | 61 | view |
- Topic Studies show that criminals get a low level of education Some people believe that the best way to reduce crime is to educate people in prison so they can get a job after leaving prison To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Topic In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- People eat more processed food than they did in the past Why is this What are the effects of this 67
- Topic Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge To what extent is this a positive or a negative development 78
- People eat more processed food than they did in the past Why is this What are the effects of this 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in general, in particular, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26530612245 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89606381343 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588921282799 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7078320134 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.4 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188135876811 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552027522308 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423256333255 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11246207861 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359840843395 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.