Traffic jam has become increasingly problematic in big cities. What are the causes and solutions to them?
In recent years, a serious problem that metropolitan cities face has been traffic congestion. From my perspective, there could be several reasons for this pressing concern and this essay will suggest some feasible solutions to tackle the problem.
There are two major causes that give room for traffic jams to develop in large cities. The first cause of traffic congestion is an increase in population. Since a large number of people have migrated to settle in urban areas like New York, Beijing for instance, an excessive number of residents commute in cities every day. As a consequence, roads and streets are often overcrowded, which, combined with insufficient infrastructure could result in heavy traffic jams, especially in peak hours. The second reason is that nowadays most citizens prefer using private vehicles such as cars to public transportation like buses or trams. This trend is due to the convenience of time-saving and flexibility. Therefore, an upsurge in population and the use of private means of transportation are the main contributors to traffic jams in big cities.
However, several actions could be taken to address this issue. To begin with, the government should spend more money on upgrading the public transport system as well as the infrastructure of transportation. With the transport system improved, city dwellers would be encouraged to travel by bus or tram instead of private means. Since the number of vehicles on the roads is reduced, it would help ease traffic congestion. Another practical measure is to impose heavy taxes on the excessive use of individual transport. This can help to discourage people from travelling in private vehicles and raise more money for improving public transport.
In conclusion, an upsurge in population, insufficient infrastructure for transportation, and people's preference for private vehicles are the main contributors to the serious issue of traffic jams. Nevertheless, some measures can be taken to deal with the problems regarding improvement to the public transport system and infrastructure, and imposition of taxes on the excessive use of private vehicles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-27 | Thuc Linh Dinh | 73 | view |
| 2014-06-15 | sandeep pooni | 80 | view |
- The pie charts give information about the percentage of world forest and timber in six different regions
- Due to the coronavirus all schools have been closed making both students and teachers use electronic devices to study online What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend Write an essay of at least 250 words to support your arguments 73
- What are the benefits of online learning Write an essay of about 250 words on this topic Make sure you support your position with relevant examples and evidence 84
- Tourism is an ever growing industry What benefits and drawbacks do you think tourism brings to individuals and society 61
- Traffic jam has become increasingly problematic in big cities What are the causes and solutions to them 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ion is an increase in population. Since a large number of people have migrated to settle in urban...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40419161677 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09489469833 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538922155689 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1824006186 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.176470588 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133133878996 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496186142843 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628666427374 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798649174149 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620715244544 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.