As transport and accommodation problems are increasing in many cities, some governments encourage businesses to move to rural areas. Do the advantages of moving to rural areas outweigh the disadvantages?
As urban centers grapple with mounting transport and housing issues, many governments propose a decentralization approach, nudging businesses towards rural locales. I, however, believe this policy could actually do more harm than good.
Advocates for decentralization often emphasize that shifting businesses to the countryside could effectively mitigate the problem of overcrowding in metropolises. This, in turn, could reduce pressure on city transport and housing systems. Nevertheless, proponents of this scheme often fail to factor in its concomitant adverse impact on rural communities. Specifically, a massive influx of businesses and migrants could strain/ overwhelm local resources and infrastructure, leading to such problems as higher traffic volumes and soaring rental prices in rural locations. Such a relocation proposal, in other words, would not really address transport and housing problems, but rather shifting them from one place to another.
There is also an argument that businesses would benefit financially from such a move, given the lower costs of land and property in rural regions. This perspective, however, is short-sighted/ myopic, overlooking the substantial incurred expenses. For instance, businesses might incur additional costs in constructing facilities from scratch, establishing robust supply chain logistics to counter the isolation of rural areas, and potentially offering higher salaries to entice employees to relocate. The initial savings could quickly be overshadowed by these additional, ongoing costs.
The workforce is another aspect where the negative impacts of rural relocation are pronounced. When a company moves out of the city, its employees may face the difficult decision of whether to follow the business or not. If they choose to relocate, they may need to uproot their families, disrupting their lives and potentially facing a lack of amenities and educational resources in rural areas. For those who choose to stay in the city, even with relocation packages or travel subsidies, their daily commutes can become very long and tiring, leading to decreased job satisfaction and productivity.
In conclusion, while transferring businesses to rural areas presents some benefits, the overall picture suggests that the disadvantages are more significant. The potential harm to rural communities, financial burdens on businesses, and the negative effects on employees' lives tip the balance against this strategy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-05 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | trong2006 | 73 | view |
- While many people go to the university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Do you agree or disagree 78
- The charts show what Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In some countries there are more young people choosing to enrol in work based training instead of attending university Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 73
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 84
- In some countries there are more young people choosing to enrol in work based training instead of attending university Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, really, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2118.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89972144847 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12972449177 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640668523677 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3374090402 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.588235294 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25103015624 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687201885638 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577830084029 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129350673118 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361126413781 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.