Travel abroad is better than domestically. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays many people argue that domestic tourism is not as good as travel abroad. In my opinion. I partly agree with this point of view because I personally believe that no matter where you travel, there are pros and cons. Therefore, going to a foreign country can help you broaden your horizons. However, in another aspect, it may bring you more risks of accidents.
First of all, it is worth considering that your mindset can be expanded by going overseas. To have a quality journey, you ought to find out information about your destinations. Consequently, you can completely gain more useful facts and depth knowledge through this process. In addition to this, taking a trip abroad might give you opportunities to learn about new cultures, traditions or cuisine. For instance, if you have a trip in Vietnam on "Tet holiday", most Vietnamese women wear colorful "Ao dai" for the reason that they believe bright colors can bring them more luck in the new year. Moreover, when you come to Thailand, you will be excited by the variety of food among different countries around the world. If Europe is famous for greasy food, Thailand's cuisines are sour and spicy. It is clear that the new experiences in foreign countries is a factor that helps you to broaden your horizons better.
On the other hand, people cannot deny that international travelling might exist more dangers than domestically. You probably find it difficult to communicate with local people or deal with cultural differences. As a result, the more otherness you have, the more troubles you face. To illustrate, for Europeans, hugs and kisses are a form of greeting. However, if they express it towards Asians in their country, they might assume this is harassment that can lead to numerous relevant different culture problems. Furthermore, when Asians travel to English countries, they may encounter risks related to racism. With the language barrier and the freedom to use guns there, nothing can guarantee their safety. Thus, people should admit that risks when crossing the border are inevitable.
In conclusion, I partly agree that international travelling is better than domestically. As I mentioned above, one of the most advantages that people receive when going overseas is opening their mind. However, we also consider avoiding the risks of accidents to have a quality foreign travel trip.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-14 | NotBNgocc | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Thy Duong | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | ngô huyền ngọc | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | ngô huyền ngọc | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | tragn.nee | 73 | view |
- Travel abroad is better than domestically Do you agree or disagree 84
- Travel abroad is better than domestically Do you agree or disagree 84
- School uniforms should be banned allowing students to freely wear their own clothes Do you agree or disagree about this topic 67
- School uniforms should be banned allowing students to freely wear their own clothes Do you agree or disagree about this opinion 67
- Fiction is more entertaining than non fiction Do you agree or disagree with this topic 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15938303342 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75572650824 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575835475578 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.495718927 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.625 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2083333333 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235163056352 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645677822274 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732281545517 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154769384667 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052726715755 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.