Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There has been a colossal upsurge in discussing whether the universities should or shouldn't accept the same volume of male and female students in every subject. Although there are many debatable opinion surrounding this phenomenon, I personally give a green light to the former statement and will scrutinize my viewpoint before a rational conclusion is reached in the following paragraph.
On the one hand, I believe that all of the genders have equivalent right in choosing the subject they long for. In the modernized age, both men and women can be able to reach the attainments in every lesson. It is an absurd when distinguish or put a racism on the possibility of one person due to their gender. Although there are some subjects require more careful skill such as sewing or cooking which is known as popular for women, I opine that any sex can access it if they have their own passion or practice unstoppably. Moreover, there are no rules or regulations that impose to restrict gender in partake in profession, subject. Taking for an instance, Gordon Ramsay and other male can be successful in cooking and do it better than a number of women chef.
However, many male and female students take admission in different subjects every year. it is an undeniable fact that less number of females decide to study in universities but in addition to it, they do not get admission in the field of their own choice because of lack of seats for female students. In reality, many courses are more popular with one gender than the other, and it would not be practical to aim for equal proportions. For example, nursing courses tend to attract more female applicants, and it would be difficult to fill these courses if fifty per cent of the places needed to go to males.
In conclusion, I believe that the selection of university students should be based on merit, and it would be both practical and fair to be unbiased to a selection procedure based on gender. The injustice in the number of gender in one subject not only the cause of illiteracy increment but also urges the females to keep their values down.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...sing whether the universities should or shouldnt accept the same volume of male and fema...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...aph. On the one hand, I believe that all of the genders have equivalent right in choosi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ssion in different subjects every year. it is an undeniable fact that less number ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76775956284 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6536356902 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53825136612 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.5967797825 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.642857143 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233753492413 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848124041995 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926274767485 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147088194062 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448397392379 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.