The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people from using cars?
With the speeding-up of living rhythm in today’s world, especially in big cities, having a car has become an essential part of many people's lives. It offers flexibility and provides ready access to many work and leisure options. However, recently, a range of induced innumerable by-products associating with the uncontrolled increase in use of cars have surfaced and need to be addressed. In this essay, I plan to identify those complicated problems and propose some feasible solutions to them.
Firstly, the widespread use of cars is one of the main causes to cities' catastrophic air quality. Exhaust gas emitted by car engines discharge large amounts of poisonous gas such as carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, carbon monoxide, etc. and many more. These toxic chemical compounds can lead to air pollution and can be harmful to people's health if they are usually exposed to it, causing respiratory issues and even lung cancer. According to a study, exhaust gas from motors' engines in general shoulders the responsibility for 30% of air pollution in Hanoi. The overuse of cars in big cities not only affect negatively on the environment, but also our own health.
Another negative aspect of using cars unlimitedly is traffic congestion. Citizens of metropolises have now gotten used to being stuck in seemingly inescapable jams. It is claimed that people often spend two to three hours commuting to work and getting home. Recently in Hanoi, residents even experience traffic jams outside of rush hours.
To alleviate these problems, many suggest the government impose a strict restriction on the use of cars. From my point of view, this is not a suitable solution. Discouraging or forbidding people to use cars on certain days can result in a decline in the car manufacturing industry, which is one of the most important industries in some countries. Moreover, cars' mobility can be significantly helpful to people's lives. To tackle this complex issue, the government should encourage car manufacturers to come out with more environmentally-friendly and affordable car lines. Furthermore, improvements on the public transport system need to be made immediately, so that it attracts more people into using it instead of driving cars.
To sum up, though it is true that cars have played a crucial role in people's life ever since they were invented, the uncontrolled overuse of cars can be damaging to society by causing air pollution, traffic congestion and many more issues. In order to solve those problems, discouraging people to use cars is definitely not a permanent cure. Instead, I deem that we should make cars that run on solar or electrical energy and improve the public transport system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-19 | qaengx12 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | claraa_ltn | 84 | view |
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on more important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The plans show changes to the layout of a theater between 2010 and 2012 73
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 73
- Computers are increasingly used in education in which areas do you think are computers more important and in which areas are teachers more important 56
- The graph shows data about the average Saturday sales of two bakeries in London in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in general, such as, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2263.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 438.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02174534573 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 176.041082164 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586757990868 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 724.5 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9763646914 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3913043478 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0434782609 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73913043478 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371914044418 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939070384366 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659067047962 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190786747348 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571281567124 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.