The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places and so mobile phones should also be banned.
To what extent do you agree or disagee?
t is believed that, as smoking, the utilisation of cell phones is ought to be prohibited due to its deleterious effects. I agree that mobile phones act antisocial in some ways, but have relatively more benefits, and thus should not be banned.
On scrutinizing the negative aspects of smartphones, it is obvious that they act as a nuisance in some cases. A good illustration of this can be cited by a person who is separating him for the sake of worshipping god, in this case, the usage of mobile phone with high volume could distract him, undubitably. In addition to this, the use of mobile phones poses an adverse impact onto the conversation between people. This is because, people tend to spend a huge amount of time on electronic gadgets, which, in turn deter their relationship.
There are myriad of reasons why I disagree with imposing of ban on cell phones. The prominent one is that in case of emergency, these serve as a boon for the individuals. For instance, if someone is caught in a mishappening like an accident or robbery, he can freely dial any contact by dint of smartphones. These can make persons able to come out of the threatening incidents and save one's life. Secondly, phones are not as harmful smoking. It is scientifically proven that dragging on cigarettes causes more dangers to the non smokers as when they inhale the stale air from the smoker.
To recapitulate, Although, there are many views supporting a ban on phone, yet the benefits attained from the phone cannot be neglected.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: T
t is believed that, as smoking, the utili...
^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...t of the threatening incidents and save ones life. Secondly, phones are not as harmf...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in addition, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80916030534 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88346590393 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645038167939 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.54195787 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9230769231 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21975654236 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705783108769 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780084571642 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142513680681 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680140771495 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.