Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree?
The leading and managing of companies are usually done by elderly people. Whereas, many people believe that young people are more suitable in this regard. I completely disagree with this idea because of the essential role of experience and the importance of credibility.
The main reason why I believe older people are more appropriate to be managers is the crucial effect of experience to overcome the difficulties and challenges that companies will face numerously. Indeed, an organization’s directors should be ready to find out the best way to solve the problems. Generally, the measures to mitigate the repercussions of disaster accidents must be examined before to ensure their effects. It can be obtained only via previous experience. For instance, in a recession period, a manager who has experienced similar crises in the past will have some effective cure to survive the company.
Another reason why I support old people in managing organizations is related to the vital impact of individual credit among staff, customers, and other institutions and companies. As a matter of fact, age is an eminent factor in communication and having control over situations. Older people are more acceptable and respectable among the employees which will be helpful in allocating tasks to them. Furthermore, credit can be taken to diminish the effect of problems in other cases such as customer dissatisfaction and economic issues. To illustrate, some people are able to provide money through connections based on their credits.
In conclusion, I entirely disagree that older people should be considered as the main options for choosing the head of companies. It is due to the significant effect of experience and credit of elderly people to remove the obstacles and barriers in front of companies.
- the chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational settings in the UK in 2019 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Crime appears to be rising in most countries in the world especially among young people Identify the possible causes of this trend and propose some solutions you think would be effective 78
- what do you think about technology in education what are the pores and cones 67
- nowadays more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same job what problems this causes what are the solutions 61
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ies are usually done by elderly people. Whereas, many people believe that young people ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce and the importance of credibility. The main reason why I believe older peop...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...effective cure to survive the company. Another reason why I support old people ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gh connections based on their credits. In conclusion, I entirely disagree that ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2972027972 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06244408013 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3449981777 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236544392229 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741805225484 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049840771399 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142439881907 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233446417398 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.