Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed by many people that videos are a better instrument to explore life of citizens around the world than books and other literature. I mostly agree to the point of view as using videos could be more digestable and convenient for the ordinary than travel documents, even though it may be costly.
The first reason why I advocate to the utilization of visual materials is that it can be understandable for the majority of users. It could be difficult to articulate colorful outfits or majestic natural landscapes of a particular region for audience through reading. Given the proliferation of technologies including cameras and social platform, observing traditional clothes and natural wonder would be easy for everyone.
Additionally, videos offter greater convenience compared to reading materials. With internet connection and smart devices, users can find out about the way of life of others globally any where and any time they long for. Tourism literature, on the other hand, would be heavy and troublesome to carry around and read, especially when people are on duty or taking long trips.
Addmittedly, creation of videos to illuminate about humans would be expensive. Visual records of remote places could examplify the phenomena, which demand a plethora of expenditure from mobility to manpower. However, users these days tend to pay for the allocations of those videos as long as they are quality content. This can be executed through donations and financial benefits from social platforms.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-11-20 | kevann | 73 | view |
2023-11-20 | kevann | 67 | view |
2023-10-21 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
2023-08-26 | dominhthanh | 73 | view |
2023-08-03 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
- Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 78
- People born today can expect to live longer than people in previous generations What are some of the positive and negative implications of this phenomenon Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some scientist thinks that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: ANY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anywhere'?
Suggestion: anywhere
...bout the way of life of others globally any where and any time they long for. Tourism lit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople are on duty or taking long trips. Addmittedly, creation of videos to illum...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29875518672 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88079186939 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634854771784 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8424840971 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.416666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139254915474 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049104625453 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544365220946 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868792659274 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638492193586 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.