Watching television is bad for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Technological advancement has given the world almost everything. Today people can acquire information about anything from around the globe within a single click. Among them one of the means of transmitting knowledge and information from one place to another is Television. Some people argue that television is harmful to the minor ones. I somehow agree with this notion and this argument will be presented in this essay.
Primarily, watching television cannot be avoided in this era of global interactions. Spectators watch TV for entertainment, for staying tuned with the latest circumstances around the globe etcetera. In every country something is happening every day. Some countries are struggling with terrorism, such as, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and so forth. Whereas, some populace, in stable conditioned countries, are participating in the prosperity of the human life and advancement of the world even further. Television shows all these pieces of information one after the other. The whole human race is agog in gaining this information and being entertained also. Thus, citizens of all ages keep on watching TV, moreover, it should not be neglected under the light of these reasons.
Contrary to this, children do not possess the mental ability of understanding everything on TV. For instance, if there is a documentary in regards to contemporary science ?health, engineering, space etcetera ?children are far away from comprehending this programme. Furthermore, the young generation, that can be observed today, is more interested in watching dramas and other entertainment programmes which is the waste of time to my mind. Children should focus more on their studies rather than killing their time in their TV lounges.
To sum up, I would reiterate that as children of today are future builders of the human beings. This requires great deal knowledge and creativity. Spending an enormous amount of time before TV cannot help them achieve their goal. Therefore, it is somewhat well said that children and TV shall not be good friends.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | msolanki | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will beuseful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
- The bar chart below shows the preference for different types of Complementary or Alternative Medicine CAM therapies among US adults in 2007 The table lists which therapies where the most popular over two years 87
- Some parents encourage young people to leave home when they become older while others think they should stay at home with the family Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Watching television is bad for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The chart below provides information about homes sold in lowa city Coralville and north liberty in years 2008 and 2009
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Technological advancement has given the ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 648, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... this information and being entertained also. Thus, citizens of all ages keep on wat...
^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...For instance, if there is a documentary in regards to contemporary science ?health, engineeri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38080495356 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98580448451 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622291021672 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4741921777 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7619047619 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.380952381 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139892277269 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376052871805 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401396735099 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781172512328 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339581073835 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.