We can get knowledge from news, but some people think we cannot trust the journalist. What do you think? What qualities do you think a successful journalist should have?
News which are often brought about by journalists are considered as one source of knowledge. However, whether we should take our belief on journalists or not has caused a heated debate. From my perspectives, those with distinct qualities are trust-worthy.
There are good grounds for arguing that news is advantageous to widen our horizons. It is undeniable that journalists had achieved specific training, including both theories and practices, prior to carrying out their job, thus the news they convey are often precise and reliable. For example, documentaries of the trade war between the two most powerful countries, America and China, are broadcasted with full analyses by reporters can provide viewers with knowledge of international commerce, tax and law. Additionally, despite some exaggerated and false information available on different genres of media, the large number of journalist’s work enables us to be well-informed of what is currently happening in every corner of the world. In earlier times, the process of sending and receiving news took many hours or even days, which was possibly due to the lack in newspaper workforce.
To be an admirable journalist, there are numerous virtues worth mentioning. Firstly, it is obvious that journalism entails honesty to transmit information with a high level of trustfulness. In fact, many reporters try to make a profit by inventing unreal stories to achieve a higher number of views, which may trigger misunderstand, adversely influencing the society. Another prerequisite of being a qualified journalist would be showing respect to individual’s privacy. Take paparazzi in Hollywood as an excellent example, who never hesitantly interfere in the lives of celebrities to take photos of them. There are lots of famous cases in which famous people got into trouble with paparazzi, leading to violence and legal pursuits.
In conclusion, it is my belief that obtaining knowledge from news is a good idea provided that every journalist is qualified.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-20 | Diem Hang 1612 | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-20 | Diem Hang 1612 | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 countries in Europe over the 3 years 2005, 2009, 2015, compared with the European average. Summaries the given information and show comparison which relative 78
- These days, it seems that an increasing number of people are leaving rural areas to live in thecity.Discuss some of the effects of rural depopulation (migration from the country to the city ) andsuggest some ways on which this trend could be reversed. 78
- Some people think that an international car-free day is an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45686900958 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17577349031 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651757188498 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.363021718 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.866666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161913843748 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502990116243 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416267487469 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110191019578 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498869933253 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.