Weddings are getting bigger and more expensive. What is the reason for this? Is it a positive or negative development?
It is argued that weddings are becoming more enormous and a great deal of money is invested. The reason for this can be due to rapid social development and an only event of life. It is a negative evolution.
To commence with, it has been widely demonstrated that social development gives people, couples lots of opportunities to organize gorgeous, prohibitively expensive weddings. In reality, it is undoubted that in modern society, there are numerous wealthy people who have conditions to rent extremely large wedding centers. Obviously, this is immediately related to social development. Furthermore, weddings may be an only event for couples, resulting in being willing to spend a huge amount of money on holding their weddings. They will not hesitate about renting spectacular places, renowned photographers , storing momentous occasions through a lot of pictures. For these reasons, weddings are getting more expensive and bigger rather than in the past.
In addition, organizing huge weddings is a signal of negative development. For instance, splashing out to arrange prohibitively expensive weddings have profound effects on couples such as lack of money to purchase their own accommodation, or private vehicles. This may be persuasive reasons why it is a negative thing. Additionally, to arrange a big wedding, woman and man should invite all family members as well as friends. It is not deniable that they may be dissatisfied with facilities that are provided. Needless to say, this could create a dire situation for those who are operating this special event. As a result, it becomes apparent there are multiple things that confirm wedding parties are not positive.
To summarize ,obviously ,there are numerous reasons for this issue and it definitely can not bring positive impacts by itself. It is recommended that governments start encouraging human beings to stop spending a lot of money to celebrate their wedding.
- Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The chart below shows the figure for international conferences held in three different cities between 1980 and 2010 67
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The bar shows the precentage of people going to cinemas in one European country in different days 67
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is argued that weddings are becoming more e...
^^
Line 3, column 605, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ectacular places, renowned photographers , storing momentous occasions through a l...
^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...arties are not positive. To summarize ,obviously ,there are numerous reasons fo...
^^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...not positive. To summarize ,obviously ,there are numerous reasons for this issu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36721311475 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00366622065 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5088675778 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9444444444 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9444444444 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356769674209 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999708918323 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879201485932 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207202915034 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503585417839 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is argued that weddings are becoming more e...
^^
Line 3, column 605, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ectacular places, renowned photographers , storing momentous occasions through a l...
^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...arties are not positive. To summarize ,obviously ,there are numerous reasons fo...
^^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...not positive. To summarize ,obviously ,there are numerous reasons for this issu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36721311475 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00366622065 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5088675778 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9444444444 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9444444444 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356769674209 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999708918323 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879201485932 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207202915034 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503585417839 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.