What are the advantages and disadvantages of open group discussions during class? Express your opinion.
There is no doubt that collective speculation on different topics during the lesson has always been under scrutiny. The type of discussion has several serious drawbacks including the appearance of conflicts and the impairment of the relationships between people. However, there are obvious benefits such as the golden opportunity to generate myriads of relevant ideas and foster the ability to protect your own opinion will be considered in the essay.
On the one hand, discussions in a group are likely to have a detrimental impact on people’s relationships. The reason is that during the expression of a particular viewpoint some may absolutely disagree with the statement and start convincing others that they are totally wrong. It inevitably leads to severe friction, and because of this group members shape a negative attitude to each other. For example, on literature lessons pupils often discuss the behaviour of book characters. Some personages act in an ambiguous way that is why a part of students estimate the demeanor positively, while the rest of undergraduates treat it negatively. Students start protecting their own views, provoking continuous quarrels and exacerbating conflicts.
On the other hand, there are some convincing arguments in favour of collective speculation during the lesson. To commence with, group discussions open up the avenue to come up with a range of unique ideas. While one is expressing their opinions and thoughts, others are able to look at the issue from a different angle. It contributes to the generation of extraordinary ideas and suggestions, enabling group members to think out of the box and investigate the topic of the class in a more profound way. In addition, during collective discussion, people are taught to provide strong arguments in support of their viewpoints and also listen to the opponents’ positions with tolerance. It fosters the sense of respect in people, because this way they learn to interact with an interlocutor during debates properly.
To conclude, despite some formidable criticisms of collective speculation including conflict development and a destructive influence on people’s attitude to each other, the benefits such as the opportunity to generate and express a number of captivating ideas and learn how to behave during discussion certainly outweigh.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-29 | whynotjules | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-29 | whynotjules | 84 | view |
- Problems of modern universities 56
- Some people think that getting a degree from a university is the best way to guarantee a good job others believe that it would be better to go straight into work and get experience instead Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- lEGALIZING RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA 76
- Extreme or adventure sports are becoming more popular among teenagers What are advantages and disadvantages of doing these types of sport 73
- Some people think that getting a degree from a university is the best way to guarantee a good job others believe that it would be better to go straight into work and get experience instead Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 504, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an ambiguous way" with adverb for "ambiguous"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...of book characters. Some personages act in an ambiguous way that is why a part of students estimate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, while, for example, in addition, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43956043956 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08511468455 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56043956044 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2049819856 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21170208822 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059919614152 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336049834129 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119766777391 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325487210817 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.