Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Almost people get their goal by lucky. My point of view, the most ambition is gained by hard-working of the people. That is the reason why this essay disagrees that everything rich people get by lucky. First of all, this essay will discuss gain the goal is the procession and then will discuss motivation, which helps people reach their success.

To begin with, reach the ambition is the procession. On the thinking of someone, the success of the people is lucky. However, my point of view, gain success is the procession because the person who is getting their target they spend a lot of things such as time, trade-off, stressful, etc. The people standing outside cannot see everything of them, as they trust to see one side when the person becomes successful. Nevertheless, they see part of the procession. Besides, achieve the aim is not only one day; this is but also day by day. For example, people open the store and his store is so famous after five years. He is not lucky to get his goal, but he tries to fix his problems and work daily in five years before his store is famous.

On the one hand, motivation is the most important in success. The newspaper on the internet usually reminds the motivation of the successful person is the primary key because the person excited and they enjoy their job. Moreover, they can deal with issues and try to follow the ambition of them. For example, the people have the amount of energetic they can deal with their problem, and they don’t give up with any problem they met.

In general, successful people not only own lucky but also they have the motivation and follow their dream. The goal is the procession, and this essay disagrees lucky is the main factor of success.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-05 Khaihoang 84 view
2019-12-02 nhoxkey200 11 view
2019-12-02 nhoxkey200 11 view
2019-10-13 coolR 67 view
2019-09-30 bennguyen95 84 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, for example, in fact, in general, such as, first of all, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69281045752 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37482785462 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477124183007 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8403268222 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7777777778 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0739467279251 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0268597268937 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.024153520965 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0515205889476 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135015498885 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.58950901804 79% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 78.4519038076 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.