While many people go to university for academic study, more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers. Agree or disagree
After graduating from high school, many students choose to go to university for academic study instead of doing vocational training. Therefore, there is a lack of qualified workers. I think vocational training should be encouraged since there is a limited amount of information and skills that university students acquire while studying.
Vocational training takes less time and is more practical to study than a university degree. They are efficient because they are skill-oriented. They will focus on what is necessary to have these skills and how to perform their tasks efficiently, whereas, the university curriculum is more extended and may in-depth explore other subjects. For example, going to a university studying 4 to 5 years degree as an electrician will not make someone change a light bold or resolve a cable problem as fast as someone that went to study this specific type of work.
Another aspect of vocational training is that most of them do not require mandatory completion of secondary school education, consequently making it easier for more students to enroll. Students who cannot graduate from high school can choose to do vocational training to have a stable job in the future. On the other side, because of easier requirements, graduating from vocational training may cause some skepticism since university graduates are considered more well-accomplished. I think this is one of the reasons that cause this lack of encouragement towards vocational training. Additionally, people might not want to do this type of job because they might have safety concerns.
In conclusion, unless there are less skepticism and more advertisements exposing the need and importance of vocational training, there might always have a lack of qualified workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-24 | buiquan | 56 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | buiquan | 56 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | buiquan | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-17 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-07 | vevinawynn | 61 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunity to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development You should use your own ideas knowledge and exper 61
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 444, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'changes'.
Suggestion: changes
...as an electrician will not make someone change a light bold or resolve a cable problem...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35971223022 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07239731776 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543165467626 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6448410572 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.615384615 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353509570051 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118879566732 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055150497839 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205696061987 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862606252029 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.