The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now. What problems will this cause? What can be done to solve these problems?
These days, many constructions have been built since previous centuries which still lived for people in many towns and cities. In my viewpoint, some significant effects can be derived from this notion along with the substantial solution regarding these problems which I will explicate in the ensuing paragraph.
Looking at the considerable effects, if the old building in a vibrant city still existed in the long run, it would deteriorate the environment surroundings since the construction has time for collapsing and would risk people. For instance, Havana’s old town kills people after a construction accident, which also might happen in any old buildings spreaded in many countries. Moreover, this might lead people to be unwilling to purchase or rent the construction. This is based on the maintenance fee of old buildings higher than new buildings. Thus, this would save their expense because they will get a proper home with new facilities.
In another viewpoint, the answer to tackle these problems is the government should make a regulation about old construction such as limiting the age of construction. This will make a small chance for collapsing because of the standard of building. Thus, people would feel more comfortable whatever the situation that happens in surroundings. In addition, The government might replace the old buildings with new ones with the same design. This is based on how many old buildings have histories in the past. Thus, this not only would have a new building but also the background of the building still has.
Overall, the issue of the existence of old buildings appears to bring significant results such as risking the people nearby and leading people to think twice before having it. Meanwhile, the alternatives are that the government should make a time regulation for constructions and should replace it with new ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-12 | MEBC Class | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-07 | Mollymaul | 67 | view |
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians Others believe that artists should be funded by alternative sources Discuss both views and give your own 78
- More and more people in developing countries are purchasing cars for the first time What problems cause this issue What do you think are the possible solutions 84
- The best way to make the road transport of goods safer is to ask drivers to take a driving test each year To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss views and give your own opinion 84
- It is believed that a heavier sentence on citizens who embroil road traffic offences can vividly optimise the safety of road users Partially I consent to the same perspective for reasonable points which I will elaborate in the forthcoming paragraph 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, still, thus, while, for instance, in addition, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23588039867 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89198411925 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538205980066 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3646950343 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.066666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226348823346 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798671453376 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495532157207 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152057738853 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680550835146 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.