young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like environment, poverty and animal welfare than previous generations. What is your own opinion?
With the mass development of technology and social welfare, the youngsters nowadays have acknowledged and greatly concerned about social issues such as environment, poverty, social evils,.. which is totally opposite to the previous generations. From my own perspectives, I utterly support this viewpoint and I will evidently give clear reasons.
To begin with, it is undoubtedly that modern life provides young people with various tools to broaden their horizon with informative knowledge about social problems. Indeed, in terms of environment, the youngsters have come across this issue countless times via school lessons or social media. To exemplify, global warming is one of the most concerning issues worldwide which can be easily grasped by TV or news. However, this didn’t exist in our father's time when they had to suffer from the ravage of war and poverty. Hence, that harsh conditions prevented them from being conscious of those problems while the teenagers today may straightforwardly encounter some climate initiatives’ banners outside their school.
Furthermore, to some abstract topic such as poverty or animal extinction, young people with no intention but pay attention to these controversial issues. Take poverty as an example, we all admit that the young today always aim to become prosperous and wealthy which has put them under huge pressure and lowered their work efficiency. On the contrary, dates back to the previous circumstances, their only responsibility is to
- Poor nutrition and obesity is a problem in many developed countries and some people believe that a tax on fast food would reduce the problem Do you agree 89
- Traffic congestion is becoming increasingly problematic in major cities What solutions can you suggest to help solve the problem 89
- young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like environment poverty and animal welfare than previous generations What is your own opinion 89
- young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like environment poverty and animal welfare than previous generations What is your own opinion 56
- Poor nutrition and obesity is a problem in many developed countries and some people believe that a tax on fast food would reduce the problem Do you agree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ch as environment, poverty, social evils,.. which is totally opposite to the previ...
^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...h as environment, poverty, social evils,.. which is totally opposite to the previo...
^^
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...s environment, poverty, social evils,.. which is totally opposite to the previous gen...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s environment, poverty, social evils,.. which is totally opposite to the previous gen...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stances, their only responsibility is to
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, while, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 230.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50869565217 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98214282076 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.704347826087 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.700142784 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.181818182 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140280074756 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481349502372 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325071518709 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943133175942 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199675323133 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.