All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?
In the fast-paced contemporary global landscape, the use and replacement of fuel-driven cars with electric vehicles has been a perennial debate. One group asserts the idea of prohibiting the use of manual cars altogether and using technologically advanced electricity-driven cars. I completely agree with this phenomenon as electricity-supported cars are environmentally friendly and consumption-efficient. I shall discuss my stance in detail with valid evidence and examples.
Predominantly, innovative electric cars are environment friendly as they do not add smoke to the environment which causes damage to the ozone layer. These cars are less noisy and use no fossil fuel saving the petrol for other beneficial uses such as use in factories and industries. Avoid using fossil fuel cars significantly enhances air pollution. Japan is one of the best examples in opting the electric cars and evidently, their pollution stats have been showing diminishing trends ever since they transitioned their traffic to automatic fuel-less cars.
Similarly, in comparison to fuel-driven cars, these cars are consumption-efficient. They are being charged at the charging station for an average of about 3 hours and go by 300 kilometres easily. The advanced cars as compared to fuel levelled cars are doubled in terms of consumption. Vividly, they are cost-effective as no charging payment is to be made. One of the prominent examples is Tesla cars being rapidly adopted in the US, UK & Canada these days. They are less sufficient in consumption and very less in cost.
To recapitulate, I would like to reiterate that I am inclined in favor of electric cars as they are harmless to the environment, and cost and consumption effective. Many developed countries have already started the transition from manual to electronic. Shortly, it is expected that more and more countries will opt for the pragmatic choice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | Amna Zeeshan | 67 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | Amna Zeeshan | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | drmona.914 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | drmona.914 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | Meet Kanabar | 77 | view |
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- 1 More and more people are using computers and electric devices to access information therefore there is no need for printed books magazines and newspapers To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- 1 Ambition is a positive quality for people to have in society today How important is it for people who want to succeed in life Is it a positive or negative characteristic 73
- User 1 Ambition is a positive quality for people to have in society today How important is it for people who want to succeed in life Is it a positive or negative characteristic 78
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them Do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42905405405 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53445876123 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584459459459 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.252002792 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5294117647 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.05882352941 7.06120827912 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258358812617 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086390704697 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635914630545 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150926582429 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055663084404 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.