Air travel produces 3-5% of the carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere, and is predicted to become the world's largest cause of environmental damage and global warming. Governments around the world plan to increase the cost of flying to encourage people to fly less. To what extent do you agree with the governments' plans?
These days, more and more airplanes are producing carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere. It has been suggested that government around the world plan to increase the cost of flying to save the environment. I partially disagree with this idea, and in this essay, I will provide some arguments to support my opinion.
From an overall perspective, there are a wide range of reasons why people believe that increasing the cost of flying can cause serious problems. From a practical point of view, the primary argument supporting this idea is that it will be difficult to find a job. Airports are getting bigger so that the expansion of airports creates jobs. If the government increase fee of flying, it is highly unlikely that employees will get hired, because of the number of passengers decreases. From a social point of view, another key argument in support of this idea is that it will be difficult for overseas students to meet their family. The result of this is that they will lonely, which in turn leads to personal problems such as depression.
However, it must be said there are several arguments support the idea that increasing the cost of flying can help to save the environment. Perhaps the strongest of these is that we can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere. It not only slow down global warming but also less danger of our natural environment.
In conclusion, in today’s globalized world, increasing the cost of flying is a topic which is very relevant to modern society. I believe quite strongly that increasing the fee of flying can cause more serious problem than benefits they can bring in.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91785714286 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62277845743 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.2287108244 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.3571428571 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259390461799 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923755435368 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976012974125 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175521855815 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747314458402 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.