Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
People are capable of buying identical items from anywhere around the globe because nations are becoming similar due to globalisation. I firmly deem that it is an affirmative development because it renders wide variety of products as well as local businesses are also upgrading to compete with global competitors.
To commence with, spectrum of choices are offered by different manufacturing companies as nations are turning into similar markets. That is to say that, it is beneficial for the developing as well as underdeveloped countries because their citizens can purchase various products which are manufactured in developed nations. For example, people can buy products which are made by Apple or Samsung from anywhere in the world; though, earlier it was arduous to procure those items without visiting their native countries. Thus, the argument is justifiable that availability of similar products anywhere around the world is a positive development.
The secondary reason to consider it as an affirmative development is that local manufacturers will have to produce quality products. This is because, a worldwide competition is being faced by local businesses and survival of their existence will only possible if they will manufacture their items as per the global standards. Consequently, products with high quality will be available for the local men and women. To exemplify, one of the domestic food chain Satabdi is upgrading the quality as well as the taste of their food to compete with McDonald. Therefore, I could opine that thus is an affirmative development.
In conclusion, it can be reiterated that people could buy international products and higher standard items will be produced by local trades, are two pivotal reasons to bolster the notion that having choices of world class identical products is a positive development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42214532872 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02705875945 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1557496564 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.583333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210790888651 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811222922056 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695729001885 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143644690137 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735703852622 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.