The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. Some people think that this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of having one language in the world?
Tourism being one of the major contributors that helped English emerge as the most important language in the world. This phenomenon has made some people think that English might become the only language spoken internationally. Using a single language everywhere helps in easy communication while traveling, business and day-to-day life but it also has some drawbacks that cannot be overlooked.
On one hand, one language certainly has benefits that will not only result in easier interactions but also result into booming economies. The most prominent outcome could be in doing business. In other words, there is no hassle in doing business if everyone speaks common tongue; exchanging ideas or getting a help will not be a frustrating job anymore. Another positive aspect using only one language can have is unity among people, which is not bound to just countries but the entire world. Better understanding of each other will have less conflicts between countries and the world can become much more peaceful. Also, students will face no cultural shock when they move abroad for studies or job opportunities and can easily adapt to the local culture. So students can focus, study properly, engage with their professors better and also feel at home.
On the other hand, there are consequences of using only one language. Firstly, people will put minimum emphasis on learning the native language because it may not be so useful in the future. This can abolish the language within the next two generations and lost of language is generally lost of the culture too. Secondly, many scriptures in areas of science, mathematics, literature, history around the globe are written in different languages. This treasure will be forgotten if no one can interpret them. The heritage of thousands of years will be nonexistent.
In conclusion, while there are a huge number of benefits of using only one language internationally, the drawbacks of losing native languages, heritage and culture is very a high price to pay.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | erman..duran95 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | erman.duran95 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Mostafaasadi | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | Prateekn | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-10 | Neelam Macwan | 84 | view |
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society?Give reasons for your answer. 73
- Most high level positions in companies are filled by men, even though the workforce in many developed countries consists of 50 percent female workers. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of management positions to women. Discuss, 61
- Writing task 1You recently read an article in a newspaper about your childhood friend with whom you have lost contact for a long time. Write a letter to the editor. In your letter:•Say which edition and when did the article appear•Explain why you lost 73
- The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. Some people think that this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally.What are the advantages and disadvantages of having one 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun conflicts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...r understanding of each other will have less conflicts between countries and the wor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18711656442 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79879190049 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579754601227 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5158036139 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4705882353 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368621579015 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117850006603 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10207374933 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220177471702 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116555030147 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.