Different cultures are mixing and the world is becoming a global village. Is it a positive or negative development? Give your own opinion and examples.
The various cultures are seen throughout the world which are mixing these days so the world could be named a global village. It appears that this mixture of different cultures has some positive points for the human being. I will explain why in this essay.
Firstly, this revolution could help people be more close to each other. If nations with different cultures to be familiar with other ones, they feel a short distance between themselves. As a result, they would be the sponsor of each other in the dangerous and vital situations such as war and natural disasters. In addition, a second and perhaps most significant benefit of changing into a global village is to decrease the negative attitude towards the differences existing in terms of the skin colour, the sexual. In one word, this trend will slowly lead to reduce the importance of origins. Thus, humans could peacefully live around the world.
It is true that the culture of countries indicates the place of origin which should be respected and followed. Despite this, today life is completely different from the ancestors' life. Therefore, these days, individuals need to combine the original cultures with other available cultures to have a modern lifestyle which is appropriate for today world.
To conclude, although nations' cultures have mixed over time and people may become far from their primary origins, it would have some benefits for both individuals and their countries. In other words, the universe would be a peaceful and safe place which nations would friendly live in. It seems to me that this trend worldwide will be more helpful for the next generations in the coming future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ancestors'' or 'ancestor's'?
Suggestion: ancestors'; ancestor's
...y life is completely different from the ancestors life. Therefore, these days, individual...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, in addition, such as, as a result, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05454545455 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5146815187 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585454545455 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6047755784 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174024235164 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554030455997 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625957604244 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118694240698 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071519227892 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.