Every year several languages die out. Some people say it is not important because if we speak fewer languges life would be easier. Do you agree or disagree?
Various types of languages are disappearing these days. It may be said that this trend is not significant at all because the fewer various languages exist, the better lives people can have. It appears that this trend is never favorable which I will explain why in this essay.
Firstly, people from different countries around the world speak in special language by which they can communicate with other citizens. If all citizens of a country, for example, the Chineses tend to speak in English, it will have a negative impact on their culture and background. This is because individuals are responsible for saving their primary language to introduce themselves to the world. However, they can learn the second language to be able to connect with people from other countries. In addition, a second and perhaps most important drawback of disappearing some languages over time is to make a gap between the generations. For instance, older people from China would not be able to talk in English as well as the youngsters. Thus, if the Chinese disappeared totally, individuals from different generations could not communicate with each other. As a result, the experiences of older people cannot be passed to the latest generation.
It is true that the existence of a unit language could be more beneficial to connect with people worldwide without any concern about what type of language others could speak. Despite this, it seems that the maintenance of the live languages which are popular in the world is a must because each language has an origin in the culture and background of the countries.
To conclude, although some people believe that a fewer variety of languages could be useful, it seems to me that this trend which has occurred recently cannot be helpful at all.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02027027027 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70995648201 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523648648649 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2547764367 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.142857143 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200775690332 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754590529211 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043724283666 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133207560191 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187987766726 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.