Famous people sometimes give their opinions on public topics. Is this a good thing? To what extent do you agree or disagree.
As freedom of speech becomes widely accepted in modern society, celebrities would like to make comments on social topics. Some people believe that is it a good phenomenon, while others object. In my own perspective, it is more advantageous for famous people to provide their opinions on public topics.
On the one hand, some of those celebrities could offer constructive and meaningful suggestions to public topics, because they are not only the super stars in their own professions, but also politicians or government officers after they retire. They could highly focus on the social problems related to the development of the country directly with the resources that they possess. For instance, Yao Ming, well-known as the greatest Chinese basketball player, is a committee member of the Communist Party. After retired, he gave several significant suggestions to Chinese sports development which promotes the heat and popularity of sports and exercises among Chinese people, especially teenagers. Apart from that, perceptions from some famous people are ahead of time and could even foresee the future. Take Zhang Zhaozhong as an example, as a former general of Chinese Navy, he pays high attention to the economic development around the world. He predicted several major events correlated to the global economy, such as the Subprime Mortgage Crisis about a decade ago.
On the other hand, no all the points of view given by celebrities are helpful, instead they could even be misleading occasionally. For example, a certain amount of young entertainers would like to post their comments of thoughts towards public topics on social media. However, without sufficient experience and insights to the issue specifically, most of their ideas are useless or even incorrect, yet teenagers who adore them could believe in them completely.
To sum up, it is an advantageous trend that celebrities give their opinions to public topics generally, since most of them have the resources and concentration to focus on the social problems. Nevertheless, some famous stars might not provide useful advice because of the lack of experience, thus the general public should learn to how to screen those negative information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...use of the lack of experience, thus the general public should learn to how to screen those neg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, apart from, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3553008596 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8616910997 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578796561605 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0990590256 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.6 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146398837972 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498433129542 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619204229414 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104249966878 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524006279516 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.