Some people believe that entertainers are more important than scientists Do you agree or disagree Support with reasons and examples from your own experience

Essay topics:

Some people believe that entertainers are more important than scientists. Do you agree or disagree? Support with reasons and examples from your own experience.

With the improvement of people's living standard, someone claims that entertainers are more important than scientists as they can enrich their spiritual life. While I partially agree with this point of view, I believe that scientists are more significant in modern society.

On the one hand, as economy and technology keep developing, large amount of people can afford a wealthy material life, and then they begin to chase a colorful spiritual life. Under this circumstance, entertainers, such as movie stars, singers and dancers, are becoming popular and adored by general public. They bring people amusement and relaxation with their works and performance. Apart from that, entertainers can play the role in leading people to serve the society as well. For instance, some super stars are not only the masters in their realms, but also representatives of charity.

On the other hand, without the foundation constructed by scientists, it is likely that general public could not even live a decent material life.Scientists are related to plenty of industries in modern society, including but not limited to manufacturing, high-end technologies, aerospace and military which are tightly connected with the development of economy and the power of a country. Once people start to imagine what their lives would be without cars, planes, cell phones and computers, they would realize the great significance of scientists. In addition, scientists who always upgrade themselves with new knowledge and tools are boosting technology to advance, therefore they are important to human beings not only before and now, but also in the future.

To conclude, entertainers are able to bring people laughter and joy, whereas scientists are serving the technological advancement and social development of human history, which is more important .

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-06-11 wjl881219 78 view
Essays by user wjl881219 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ers, are becoming popular and adored by general public. They bring people amusement and relaxa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ructed by scientists, it is likely that general public could not even live a decent material l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Scientists
...ld not even live a decent material life.Scientists are related to plenty of industries in ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...f human history, which is more important .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48056537102 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98065200114 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604240282686 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.3422521416 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1818181818 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218132587479 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864697667309 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706599327453 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152774819707 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839232274247 0.056905535591 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.