Fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy (wind energy and solar energy) are encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Seeing the negative impact of energy-generating fuels on our atmosphere, a large portion of society is criticizing its usage. People have started switching their investments from earthly fuels to renewable energy sources as a form of encouragement for the latter. This is surely a progressive step towards a safer and healthier planet.
Over the last few decades, the world has consumed an extensive amount of natural resource to increase infrastructural production. Large scale industries, factories and many laboratories utilized most amount of fuels for their benefits and favoured back by releasing harmful and hazardous gases into the atmosphere. Though it did not seem to have much impact initially, with the passing decades, a rigorous increase in demand and production led to damage of the atmospheric sanity. As a result, our planet is facing terrible threats such as global warming, worsened air quality and chemically influenced water. The city of Delhi is under a life threat due to its harmful air quality. Hence, the idea of renewable energy came into the picture.
Unlike fuel energy, renewable energy sources do not depend on the use of coal, oil or gases for its generation. This energy source is purely based on the consumption of sunlight in regards to solar energy and windmills in regards to wind energy. They are safe to use, non-flammable and does not require any extractions from the soil. Many cities in India have started using solar-powered panels to generate electricity for domestic purposes. A motor company Tesla has also introduced the concept of solar-powered vehicles. These positive approaches towards a healthier and a much safer planet may someday bring back the beauty of this world.
Summarizing, it is affirmed that the increase in the use of renewable energy will improve the quality of life for all the beings of this planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | geetha balasubramaniam | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | Harijot | 73 | view |
- Many young people are leaving their homes in rural areas to study or work in the cities. What are the reasons?Do the advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages? 56
- Nowadays it is common for people to get married and have children in their thirties rather than when they are younger.Do you agree or disagree that this trend will benefit society? 89
- Since the 18th-century technological advances have replaced people in the workplace. With today’s technology, this process is happening at a greater rate. Technology is increasingly responsible for unemployment.To what extent do you agree or disagree wi 84
- Many people believe that social networking sites (facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree. 56
- Some people argue that arts, such as paintings and music, are a waste of money and the government should spend this money on other public services.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t initially, with the passing decades, a rigorous increase in demand and producti...
^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...ly based on the consumption of sunlight in regards to solar energy and windmills in regards t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...n regards to solar energy and windmills in regards to wind energy. They are safe to use, non-...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, so, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21523178808 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92946815885 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592715231788 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0970581576 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4375 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246758989173 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754185206373 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843973665422 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147884554573 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825505757717 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.