Giving Pocket Money to Children is very common in many countries. Discuss both the advantages as well as disadvantages about the practice and what is your opinion about it.
Childhood is the perfect time to learn money management. It is increasingly become normal to give some pocket money to children. In my opinion, this would beneficial for them to learn the basics of money management although there are some drawbacks. Let us discuss this further to have a better understanding.
If we consider the benefits, one of the major advantages of giving pocket money to children is that they can learn how to spend money responsibly. To elaborate, when they have their own cash, they learn not to waste it because if they did, they would have trouble buying what really needed. For instance, a child can spend his pocket money to buy candy if their parent packs him a delicious lunch. But if he had to buy his lunch from the given cash, he would definitely reconsider spending on candy. Which teaches how to manage it properly and responsibly.
On the other hand, there are some negative impacts of this practice. Firstly, this money can be spent on consuming unhealthy products such as alcohol or cigarette. Secondly, it can leverage to involve in a bad company especially when they are in adolescence.
However, eating unhealthy foods, and getting involved with various kind of people cannot be avoided just by not giving pocket money. In fact, parents should guide them to be responsible and avoid detrimental habits.
To sum up, despite the negative habits of consuming alcohol and wasting time with harmful people, giving some cash to children with proper guidance would give them a chance to learn and be responsible about their money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...specially when they are in adolescence. However, eating unhealthy foods, and get...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, for instance, in fact, kind of, such as, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95471698113 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61421477762 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57358490566 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6252924395 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170196512781 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568862021887 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624293377369 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920068100785 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469314967929 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.