A government has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure their safety. Therefore, some people think that the government should increase spending on defense but spend less on social benefits. To what extent do you agree?
Spending on military has become a subject of extremely controversial topics in recent years because of its effects on societies. Although armed forces are vitally important in protecting a nation, raising the amount of financial resources for them is not worthwhile.
It is clear that military is definitely imperative to a nation. First, its primary duty is defense the nation and its interests against either internal or external enemies. Actually, by spending a massive amount of money on defense, American government ensures their nation is not subject to directly attack by any nations since their military is supposed to be the most powerful forces of the world. Second, military also participates in non-military tasks. In fact, these forces contribute to dealing with some kinds of disasters, such as earthquakes, flood and forest fires, which helps to reduce the loss of life and property since they offer assistance to the victims with invaluable support in rescue and emergency medical services.
Nevertheless, spending more on defense is not without limitations. First, it comes at the expense of diminishing on other sectors, which negatively impacts to society’s development. For instance, if children who are the future national leaders are not equipped enough knowledge to deal with the challenges that they have to face in the future since the financial supports on education is reduced, which leads to detrimental effects on development of country due to their wrong decisions. Second, raising of amount on military also causes impacts on individuals at some point. For example, in order to increase the funding on military without cutting off the other areas’ expenditures, higher taxes would be imposed, which put more burdens to people since the money that they take to home is lesser.
In conclusion, given that military is crucial for defense purposes, increasing its budget does not offer a net positive benefit. In order to maintain the national stability, government should take steps to strike a balance between military and non-military funding.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-21 | Thaonguyen1409 | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from death health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disag 84
- It is becoming more and more difficult to escape the influence of the media on our lives. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living in a media rich society. 78
- Illiteracy has traditionally been viewed as largely a third world problem However it is becoming apparent that in countries such as the USA and Australia illiteracy is on the increase Discuss possible causes for this and its effect on society 82
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money Discuss both views and give your own opinion 96
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems. What are the problems of motorways and what are solutions? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39329268293 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90430708228 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57012195122 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.2918204612 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.357142857 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136768671426 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493820856816 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476378765454 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852373402916 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234726032189 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.